Monday, November 3, 2008

Please vote today!

Regardless of who you pick, please don't sit this one out. This is one of the most important elections of our lifetimes. If you do some research, I'm sure you'll make the right decision. If you already plan on voting, please take some time to encourage your friends and co-workers to vote.

If you don't know who to vote for, http://glassbooth.org/ is a fun, non-partisan way to determine which candidates share your views. For example, I'm a 75% match to Obama. (I'm also a 79% match to Nader, but that's a different story.)

In case you're interested, here are a few of the many reasons I've decided to vote for Obama:

1) Obama will give tax cuts to anyone making less than 200k/yr. If you make less than 111k/yr., Obama will give you a bigger tax cut than McCain. If we've learned anything from the last 8 years, it's that trickle-down economics don't work. A strong middle class is one of three key ingredients of a succesful democracy, and with steeply rising gas and medical care prices, our middle class standard of living has quickly eroded. Even though our taxes haven't risen, the cost of living has gone up, the value of the dollar has gone down, our 401ks have deflated, and salaries haven't kept pace. If you feel the pinch, I assure you, you're not alone.

I believe in a progressive tax. A 2004 scientific study of the percentage of income paid in taxes concluded that "the lowest 20 percent income bracket paid at a rate 2.2 times that of the top 1 percent, whereas the middle 20 percent paid at a rate 1.8 greater" (http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=undercutting-fairness). In the 4 years since that study, rising gas prices and the economic crisis have amplified this divide. Obama's tax plan will relieve the burden on our middle class and revitalize our economy.

It's worth noting that Warren Buffet also supports Obama. He says, "if you're in the luckiest 1 per cent of humanity, you owe it to the rest of humanity to think about the other 99 per cent." (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/tax/article1996735.ece?print=yes)

2) Obama graduated first in his class from Harvard, and he was president of the Harvard Law Review. Obama is a constitutional scholar. With warrantless wiretapping, torture, the DMCA, incarceration without due process, warrants handed down from secret courts, and an unprecedented, unconstitutional expansion of the vice president's responsibilities, we need a healthy respect and appreciation for our constitution now more than ever. The current administration scared us into giving up our rights and liberties. It's time to take them back.

3) Obama has clearly demonstrated foresight. I encourage you to read the (short) transcript of his 2002 speech urging us not to go to war in Iraq: http://usliberals.about.com/od/extraordinaryspeeches/a/Obama2002War.htm

Here's an excerpt: "What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks like Karl Rove to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income, to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression." Sound familiar?

After 9/11, we had a surplus of good will coming to us from the rest of the world. Somehow, the current administration managed to throw that away and foster even more resentment from the Middle East and beyond.

I recently watched the movie In the Shadow of the Moon (http://tinyurl.com/54vov4). The contrast between the overflowing love for the United States after we landed on the moon and today's perception of the US is striking. We're at a turning point in our history. It's hard to imagine a world where the United States isn't at the healm, but the truth is, we haven't actually been here for that long, and there's no guarantee that we'll stay there.

Obama undestands that our current strategy in Iraq won't scale to Iran, North Korea, China. We need to work smarter, not harder. He understands that the United States can't fix the world's problems on its own.

As Bill Clinton put it, Obama "will work for an America with more partners and fewer adversaries. He will rebuild our frayed alliances and revitalize the international institutions which help to share the costs of the world's problems and to leverage our power and influence. He will put us back in the forefront of the world's fight to reduce nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and to stop global warming. He will continue and enhance our nation's global leadership in an area in which I am deeply involved, the fight against AIDS, TB and malaria, including a renewal of the battle against HIV/AIDS here at home. He will choose diplomacy first and military force as a last resort. But in a world troubled by terror; by trafficking in weapons, drugs and people; by human rights abuses; by other threats to our security, our interests, and our values, when he cannot convert adversaries into partners, he will stand up to them." (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/27/bill-clinton-democratic-c_n_121941.html)

According to Colin Powell, this is the primary reason he turned his back on his party to support Obama (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27265369/).

4) Obama understands that hard work alone will not secure the US's place in the world. We simply can't go head to head with China and India in this regard. They have an order of magnitude more people, all of whom have more to gain and less to lose than your average American. The best way to retain and increase our lead (where we still have it) is to invest in education, science and technology. As a technologist and an all around geek, I can tell you that Obama really gets science and technology like no president has before.

Obama understands that drilling for oil in the US will account for only 1% of our current consumption starting 10 years from now. It's not worth the damage it will do to our environment. Obama's commitment to wean us off oil in 10 years reminds me of Kennedy's promise to take us to the moon in the same amount of time. When Kennedy promised man would walk on the moon, no one had the slightest idea of how we'd get there. But we did it, and we'll do the same for energy, and the world will love us for it.

Thank you. If you're still undecided, I encourage you to watch Obama's 30 min. special, American Stories, American Solutions:


5 comments:

  1. Good stuff. Great minds think alike. It's 6:00 in St. Louis. Polling places just opened, and lines of over 200 people are already stretched around buildings. This is going to be historic!

    More reasons to vote for Obama for your readers @ www.peacebetweenpeople.blogspot.com.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good thoughtful post.

    One question though-- from the SCIAM article you reference: "Few realize, however, that state and local taxes are so strongly regressive that they cancel out much of the progressivity of the federal tax."

    So why would you propose treating the symptoms at the federal level when the problem is at the state level?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I never like it when a person speaks about a candidate and lists no faults. That makes me think that the person is not as open-minded as they like to believe. I look at myself as more of a realist and by only listing non-factual positive points about the candidate it seems like you could be blinded by this person's well-written speeches. I am always hesitant to believe what anyone says based on just their words. Their actions are a different story and I cannot base an opinion either way on Obama because he has not been around long enough. How many times has Obama not decided either way on an issue by casting a non-vote? That speaks of great volumes to me. In order to be a truly great leader you should have an opinion and speak it freely and always act accordingly. In my mind Barack Obama has radical ideas, but when he speaks, it seems like he tells everyone what they want to hear. Am I right about how Obama thinks or are you? No one can really say for sure, until what? Until he is in office and is that where you want to figure out that you may have made a mistake in judgment? I agree with most of your Democratic views because I hold the same ones, but what people need to realize is that there is going to be a majority of Democrats elected to Congress and that's what is important. I think it's funny that people argue about the experience factor when talking about Sarah Palin. She just as much experience as Barack Obama. Anyways, I'm at work and need to get back to doing what I do to get paid. Vote for John McCain for the President of the United States of America!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nice summary. Hope your dreams and hopes come true. Change in the way America deals with the world will lead to a reciprocal effect. The rest of the world hopes for this change.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous,

    I don't see adjusting percentages at the federal level as a workaround. The issue is bigger than state taxes. When deciding how much to tax, we need to account for the base cost of living.

    Unless you opt for luxury upgrades, certain things cost the same no matter how much money you make: groceries, gas, school supplies, car insurance, health insurance, continuing education, baby sitting, cable TV, water, electricity, gas, regressive state taxes, etc. Theoretically speaking, let's say that the fixed costs for what we consider a middle class standard of living amount to 20k/yr. If I make 35k and you make 70k, the base costs account for 66% of my total income while they only account for 28% of yours. If we charged a flat 30% income tax, that would amount to 70% off my left-over income, while the government would only take 42% of your left-over income.

    We need to take these fixed, regressive costs into account when we decide what percentage to tax people. We need to find a good balance. If you think someone deserves a middle class standard of living, we don't want to tax them into a lower middle class standard of living. We also want to leave people a little money so they can invest a little without sacrificing too much, so that if they work hard, they can still spend time with their kids, eventually move up, and they aren't always struggling to get by.

    I think that the Bush tax cut put things out of balance, and we've seen a pretty steep increase in this base cost of living. We need to adjust for both. I think that McCain's plan to double down on Bush's tax cut is irresponsible and selfish. We need to stop depending so much on credit as country. It's a shuffling game that's weakening the dollar and deflating the value of our assets. Why do I care about a penny ante $1k tax cut when my house value has lost 60k in the past year? I think Obama's tax plan is part of a bigger strategy that will get us back on track, back to the prosperity and balance we saw in 2000 (balanced budget, good standard of living, etc.).

    Dave,

    I'm not trying to convince you to vote for Obama. I'm biased. I've already made up my mind. You should do your own independent investigation and draw your own conclusions. The important thing is that you vote. If you can't decide between Obama and McCain, give Nader some love. Maybe he'll have a better chance next time as a result.

    Is Obama perfect? No, but iterating his faults is out of the scope of this letter. I didn't even get to all the reasons I'm voting for him (health care, crime, capital gains exemption for startups, off-shoring), let alone the many reasons I didn't vote for McCain.

    For example, I think Obama's association with Rezko when he bought his home showed a lapse of judgement. Do I think that Obama is duping us and is on the take? Of course not. Obama graduated first in his class from Harvard. If all he cared about was money and power, there are much easier ways for him to get it. Helping poor people who can't help themselves as a commmunity organizer and studying foreign policy and the constitution are not those ways. Also, I think McCain going to bat for Keating showed a much bigger lapse of judgment. That resulted in a financial crisis almost as big as today's.

    As for voting "present", the world isn't black and white. There are plenty of good reasons to abstain. First, Obama is moderate, not a radical, and his 11-year voting record supports that (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama). Just because you're not familiar with his record doesn't mean it doesn't exist. He could be partisan and always vote "yes" on Democratic legislation and "no" on Republican legislation, but do we want someone like that? I don't. I'm somewhere in the middle myself.

    Politics is a contact sport. Sometimes people rush legislation hoping that Senators won't have time to review it. Voting "present" acknowledges this fact. If you haven't had time to review a bill, it would be irresponsible to vote one way or the other. Sometimes, Republican will propose bills (especially related to abortion) that they know will have to be voted down because they aren't constitutional. Rather than vote no and give the Republicans fodder they can twist in the next election, vote "present" based on unconstitutionality. Finally, as a state senator, you represent your district. If your district is evenly divided, you shouldn't take a side.

    While I care about more than experience, I do think it's funny that McCain would criticize Obama's experience and then pick Palin. While Palin has held political office for about the same amount of time as Obama, she spent most of that time as mayor of a town about half the size of SEMO. After that, she was governor of a state of 600k, mostly funded by oil money, while Obama was one of two people representing a diverse state of 13M. Also, Obama's foreign policy and constitutional education extend long before he held political office. He has a genuine interest in and curiosity about these issues that Palin clearly lacks. I think it's safe to say that Palin's knowledge in these areas and her intelligence in general don't stack up to Obama's. She was chosen to appeal to "value" voters, not for her knowledge and experience.

    That said, I'm at a loss for how you can classify my entire letter as "non-factual".

    ReplyDelete